Architectural facade nano protection: self-cleaning, superhydrophobic and anti-fouling coating system

2026-07-31 · Category: Technical Knowledge

🌐 This article was automatically translated from Chinese. Please refer to the original Chinese version if needed. · اصل (چینی) دیکھیں

The building facade is the face of a city's image, and it is also the most vulnerable to pollution, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, rainwater, and microbial erosion. Traditional exterior wall paint mainly relies on thickness and pigments to resist the environment, but it still struggles against haze and cooking fume adhesion, mold growth, and long-term UV chalking. Nano protective coating uses superhydrophobic rolling-off, photocatalytic decomposition, UV shielding, and antibacterial and anti-mold properties to turn "passive dirtiness" into "active cleanliness," and is becoming an upgrade direction for high-end curtain walls, public buildings, and residential facades. This article follows the functional coating framework of Overview and Classification of Nanomaterials to clearly explain the mechanisms, material combinations, and acceptance criteria of nano protection for building facades.

Kexin New Materials (kexinMaterials) provides "primer-intermediate-topcoat"配套 in the field of building protection, where the topcoat nano clear coat is responsible for self-cleaning and weather resistance, often working in synergy with anti-rust and anti-corrosion systems (for example, nano composite anti-rust fillers used for metal components). For a building, a clean facade and non-rusting components are equally important, and the two can be uniformly planned using nano technology.

Schematic of rainwater beading and rolling off to carry away dust on a high-rise curtain wall facade coated with nano self-cleaning clear coat

I. What Erosions Does a Building Facade Face

Building exterior facades are exposed to the outdoors year-round, enduring multiple synergistic damages. Understanding these damages is the prerequisite for designing protective coatings. The essence of facade protection is to set up defenses against these damaging factors one by one, rather than relying on a single coat of paint to "leave it to chance."

Pollutant adhesion. Atmospheric dust, cooking fumes, and automotive exhaust soot will deposit on the facade. Hydrophilic surfaces are more likely to stick to these pollutants, forming a difficult-to-clean gray-black layer over time. What is more troublesome is that these pollutants undergo secondary reactions with rainwater and UV radiation, binding more firmly to the paint film. Later manual cleaning becomes very difficult, requiring high-pressure water or chemicals that damage both the paint and the substrate. This is also why the nano combination of "reject water first, then decompose" is more popular in heavily polluted cities.

UV aging. UV in sunlight causes organic resins to break chains, chalk, and discolor. Dark-colored coatings are especially obvious because dark colors absorb more light energy and have higher temperature rise. UV aging is the main reason facades "look old fastest." Many buildings show signs of aging in just three to five years, and the root cause lies in insufficient UV shielding of the clear coat.

Rainwater and freeze-thaw. Coatings with high water absorption repeatedly expand and contract during freeze-thaw cycles, easily cracking and efflorescing; this problem is more prominent in northern winters. Water is also a carrier of pollutants and microorganisms; a facade with high water absorption equals providing a breeding ground for dirt and mold. Hydrophobic nano clear coat can simultaneously alleviate freeze-thaw and microbial problems by reducing water absorption, making it a cost-effective "one move, multiple effects."

Microbial growth. Facades that are humid, shaded, and near greenery easily grow mold and algae, forming black and green spots that are both unsightly and hard to clean. Mold and algae also secrete acidic metabolites that in turn corrode the coating, creating a "the dirtier it gets, the easier it gets dirty" cycle.

Stubborn stains hard to clean. High-altitude cleaning is costly and risky, so facades should best "need little cleaning" or even "self-clean" to reduce maintenance costs. For hospitals, airports, and commercial complexes that value image and fear disturbing residents, the value of self-cleaning is especially high.

Nano protective coating provides answers to these five points respectively: "hydrophobic water rejection, photocatalytic decomposition, UV shielding, antibacterial and anti-mold, low surface energy for easy cleaning." It is not a single function, but a combination punch.

II. Four Types of Nano Protection Mechanisms

2.1 Superhydrophobic Self-Cleaning (Rolling-off Route)

Use hydrophobic nano SiO₂ (see Hydrophobic Modification of Nano SiO₂) to build a structure of "low surface energy plus micro-nano roughness," making the water contact angle greater than 150 degrees. Raindrops bead on the surface and roll off, carrying away floating dust—this is the "lotus leaf effect." It is suitable for facades, glass, and metal curtain walls. The most critical point of this route is wear resistance—the rough structure must be embedded in wear-resistant resin, otherwise the structure is flattened and fails after a few wipes.

Here it must be clarified "where the roughness comes from": hydrophobic SiO₂ particles themselves are only tens of nanometers; a film formed alone has a surface close to mirror-like, and the contact angle cannot rise. It must rely on particle accumulation or phase separation with resin to create a micro-plus-nano secondary rough structure to trigger the Cassie-Baxter state (water beads suspended on rough peaks with air below). Therefore, the process core of superhydrophobic clear coat is to control the arrangement of particles in the film and the shrinkage of the resin, rather than simply adding SiO₂. Many products fail to achieve superhydrophobicity because the roughness is not created, not because the SiO₂ dosage is insufficient.

2.2 Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning (Decomposition Route)

Nano TiO₂ (anatase) produces electron-hole pairs under UV irradiation, which can decompose organic pollutants and generate photo-induced superhydrophilicity, allowing water to spread into a film and carry away dirt (see Nano TiO₂ Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning). It is opposite in direction to the hydrophobic route (forming a film rather than beads) but equally removes dirt. TiO₂ can also partially decompose gaseous pollutants such as NOx, belonging to "environmental catalysis." Note: the photocatalysis of TiO₂ may also attack organic binders, requiring weather-resistant resin and isolation.

Mechanistically, the band gap of anatase is about 3.2 eV, corresponding to an absorption edge near 387 nm, which exactly absorbs near-UV. The hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals produced after light exposure are extremely oxidizing, able to mineralize organics in grease, bird droppings, and soot into carbon dioxide and water, so the facade can be "cleaner the more it is sunned." But the other side of the coin is that these radicals are indiscriminate and also attack the coating's own organic resin, causing resin chalking after long-term light exposure. Therefore, in engineering, either choose photolysis-resistant binders (such as fluorocarbon, silicone-acrylic) or coat TiO₂ with silica for isolation, letting it act outward but not inward. This is why "containing nano TiO₂ means high-end" is a misconception; the key lies in coating and配套.

2.3 UV Resistance and Weathering (Shielding Route)

Nano TiO₂ and ZnO are efficient UV shielding agents that protect the lower resin and substrate from UV scattering and absorption, slowing chalking and discoloration. ZnO also has antibacterial properties, suitable for humid facades; nano Al₂O₃, etc., can also improve hardness and wear resistance. This route is the foundation of facade durability, and almost all outdoor nano clear coats contain UV shielding components.

From an optical principle perspective, these metal oxides have strong absorption edges for UV, and their particle size is comparable to UV wavelength, enabling Mie scattering to reflect UV and prevent it from reaching the lower resin. Particle size control is critical: too large reduces scattering efficiency and causes whitening; too small mainly absorbs and the shielding bandwidth is insufficient. Usually, the particle size distribution is optimized to minimize UV transmittance. It must be reminded that UV shielding and visible light transparency must be balanced, so the shielding particles in building clear coats need surface treatment and particle size control to "block UV but not visible light," keeping the facade color true.

2.4 Antibacterial and Anti-Mold (Biological Protection)

Nano Ag and ZnO can inhibit mold and algae (see Nano Antibacterial Materials Ag/ZnO), suitable for lower layers, shaded and humid facades, and balconies near greenery. Ag is effective even without light, complementing the light-driven TiO₂ to form full coverage protection in both bright and dark conditions.

Mechanistically, silver ions released by Ag can destroy the cell membranes and enzyme systems of microorganisms; low concentration can inhibit bacteria, and it works without relying on light, so it is especially suitable for weakly lit positions such as shaded areas and indoor balconies. ZnO relies on zinc ions and photo-generated active oxygen to inhibit bacteria, and also provides UV shielding, making it "one material, multiple functions." But two points must be noted: first, Ag is costly, and the addition amount must be optimized; excess brings no extra benefit and may cause environmental release concerns (see Nanomaterial Safety and MSDS); second, the antibacterial agent must be evenly dispersed in the film and slowly released, made into a "sustained type" rather than "one-time" to cover the entire service life.

III. Synergistic Combination: One Plus One Greater Than Two

In engineering, these mechanisms are usually used in combination rather than alone.

TiO₂ decomposition plus SiO₂ hydrophobic rolling-off. Pollutants are first decomposed into small molecules by TiO₂, then carried away by rolling water beads, making cleaning more thorough than a single route.

ZnO UV resistance and antibacterial plus hydrophobic SiO₂ water rejection. Simultaneously solves weather resistance and anti-mold, suitable for humid and rainy regions.

Ag sustained antibacterial plus TiO₂ photocatalysis. Bright areas rely on photocatalysis, dark areas rely on Ag ions, for all-weather protection.

Nano fillers plus weather-resistant binders. Binders such as fluorocarbon, silicone-acrylic, and aliphatic polyurethane determine the upper limit of durability, while nano provides functionality. The core of the combination is "layered division of labor, avoiding mutual cancellation"—for example, when TiO₂ photocatalysis coexists with organic resin, isolation is needed; hydrophobic layers and hydrophilic TiO₂ layers should be zoned or coated, otherwise functions conflict.

In actual formulation design, there is another consideration: the volume fraction and particle size distribution of nano fillers affect the transparency and gloss of the clear coat. Facade clear coats mostly require high transparency, no yellowing, and no hiding of the substrate, so nano particles need surface treatment to reduce light scattering, and the addition amount must be restrained. Sacrificing transparency for function does not work on facades, which is why building nano clear coats pay more attention to being "invisible" than using nano in industrial anti-corrosion. In addition, when constructing at low temperatures in winter, resin curing is slow; if the nano dispersion has average compatibility with the main paint, shrinkage cavities and orange peel are likely to appear. Construction tolerance must be verified in advance through formulation.

Laboratory evaluating the durability of nano clear coat on exterior wall paint panels under UV aging and contact angle testing

IV. Binder and System Compatibility

Nano protection is not an isolated topcoat; it must be embedded in a complete coating system to be durable.

Substrate treatment.The wall substrate must be solid, dry, and have moderate pH; efflorescence must be treated first and hollow areas repaired—this is the prerequisite for all protection. Concrete walls are highly alkaline and have high moisture content, so they must be cured for a sufficient period (generally over 28 days) and have moisture content and pH tested; only after meeting the standards should primer be applied; otherwise alkali will steadily migrate upward and damage the clear coat. Old walls also need assessment of the existing coating condition; loose, chalky old paint must be thoroughly removed, otherwise the adhesion of the new system is out of the question. Substrate preparation accounts for more than half of the success or failure of facade protection, yet it is most easily compromised by the owner compressing the schedule and burying hidden risks.

Primer. Seals, resists alkali, and improves adhesion, connecting the substrate and the topcoat.

Intermediate coat or main paint. Provides color and thickness, and is the main body for hiding and decoration.

Nano clear coat. The outermost transparent or lightly tinted self-cleaning, weather-resistant layer, and the carrier layer of nano functionality.

For metal curtain wall components, refer to the anti-corrosion system (see nano composite anti-rust filler); the primer provides cathodic protection or barrier, and the topcoat provides nano weather resistance. Metal and walls are protected with a unified approach.

V. Performance and Acceptance Standards

Architectural facade nano coatings should be accepted by quantitative testing, not just by "looks clean".

Contact angle. Hydrophobic or superhydrophobic measured per ISO 27448, ASTM D7334, target greater than 100 degrees (hydrophobic), greater than 150 degrees (superhydrophobic).

Self-cleaning. Per the self-cleaning performance of ISO 27448, or contaminant rinse-off rate test, to see the proportion of dirt carried away by rainwater.

Weather resistance. Per GB/T 1865 (xenon lamp) or ISO 11341 to evaluate chalking and color change (ΔE).

Adhesion. Per GB/T 9286 cross-cut method, grade 0 or 1 is excellent. Poor adhesion of facade clear coat will cause entire sheets to lift, so this is a basic threshold and must be actually tested on the system, not just by looking at the clear coat's individual data.

Algae and mold resistance. Per GB/T 1741 or ASTM G21. For areas near greenery and humid regions, it is recommended to write the mold resistance grade requirement into the contract and conduct long-term outdoor panel verification, as short-term laboratory results can sometimes be overly optimistic.

VOC and hazardous substances. Controlled per GB 30981-2020 (architectural protection class), GB 18582 (interior wall), etc. Facades are mostly exterior walls, but if used in semi-enclosed spaces such as balconies and corridors, interior wall limits must also be met, not just exterior wall standards.

In addition to the above national standards, it is recommended to also cite ISO 27448 for contact angle and self-cleaning, to facilitate external benchmarking and export projects. Upon acceptance, suppliers should be required to provide a comparison of "initial value plus post-abrasion value", rather than only the initial value, so as to reflect true durability. For key projects, it is recommended to retain samples for parallel comparison of natural exposure and artificial accelerated aging, aligning laboratory conclusions with field performance.

It must be especially emphasized: the abrasion and scrub resistance of superhydrophobic coatings is a key acceptance item. Many samples have an initial contact angle above 150 degrees, but after a few scrubs it drops below 100 degrees, making the protection virtually useless. Therefore, contact angle must be measured after reciprocating scrubbing, and judged by the "retention rate after scrubbing", rather than just the initial value.

VI. Comparison Table of Nano Protection Material Combinations

Protection target Dominant nano material Synergistic material Mechanism Key acceptance
Self-cleaning (rolling off) Hydrophobic SiO₂ Resin rough structure Low surface energy plus roughness Contact angle greater than 150 degrees
Self-cleaning (decomposition) Anatase TiO₂ Weather-resistant base material Photocatalysis plus photoinduced hydrophilicity Contaminant degradation rate
UV resistance and weather resistance TiO₂ or ZnO Weather-resistant resin UV shielding Xenon lamp ΔE
Antibacterial and mold proof Ag or ZnO Hydrophobic SiO₂ Ions or active oxygen GB/T 1741
Comprehensive easy-clean SiO₂ plus TiO₂ plus ZnO Fluorocarbon or PU Multi-mechanism synergy Comprehensive retest

VII. Construction and Common Misconceptions

Construction key points: the substrate must meet standards, and environmental temperature and humidity must comply with general architectural coating construction specifications; the nano clear coat should be thin and even, as an extremely thin film is sufficient to function, and excessive thickness instead damages transparency and adhesion; avoid dust contamination of the uncured film. In addition, excessive wind speed at the construction site easily causes the clear coat to dry too fast and poor leveling; construction is strictly prohibited during rain or when there is high risk of condensation; in low winter temperatures, allow the base material to fully cure before allowing personnel and equipment on it. For superhydrophobic clear coats, roller application is easier to control film thickness and roughness consistency than spraying, and is a more reliable process choice on site.

Common misconceptions are as follows.

Misconception 1: Superhydrophobic equals permanently clean. Wrong. The micro-nano rough structure wears out; many samples start at 150 degrees but fail after a few scrubs, so wear-resistant resin must be selected and accepted by post-scrub retest.

Misconception 2: TiO₂ self-cleans without light. Wrong. Pure TiO₂ needs UV; shaded sides and nights are weak; visible-light self-cleaning requires doping or combining with Ag.

Misconception 3: Nano clear coat can cover bad substrate. Wrong. If the substrate has hollows, efflorescence, or poor adhesion, even the best clear coat will delaminate.

Misconception 4: Higher contact angle is better. Wrong. Superhydrophobic often sacrifices wear resistance; a balanced window should be comprehensively selected for durability, e.g., a dense layer of 120 to 150 degrees is more balanced.

Misconception 5: Only topcoat, no system. Wrong. A complete "primer-intermediate-topcoat" system is durable; metal components also need anti-rust primer, see nano composite anti-rust filler.

Scene of construction personnel roller-coating nano self-cleaning clear coat on building exterior facade at height

VIII. Safety and Compliance

Inhalation of dust from nano TiO₂, SiO₂, ZnO requires protection (see nano material safety and MSDS); fluorinated modifiers need attention to PFAS regulatory risks; finished products must meet architectural coating VOC and heavy metal limits. Kexin New Materials (kexinMaterials) completes the "four-piece set" of contact angle, weather resistance, antibacterial and scrub retest for its nano clear coat before leaving the factory, and attaches a construction process card to ensure the designed performance can truly be achieved on site, rather than staying only at laboratory data.

There are a few points on the compliance level worth mentioning separately. First, although fluorinated modifiers have extremely strong hydrophobicity, PFAS substances have entered restriction or phase-out channels in many regions; if facade projects have no special anti-corrosion needs, alkyl-modified SiO₂ without fluorine should be prioritized to avoid future compliance risks. Second, once nano fillers in the coating are cured they are wrapped by resin; the dust at the construction stage (spraying, sanding) is the focus of protection, and the risk of the finished paint film is very low, so the safety focus is on factories and sites rather than occupants. Third, environmental release of antibacterial agents (especially Ag) must be controlled at the wastewater end, to avoid direct discharge of nano-silver-containing wastewater. Writing these three points into supplier evaluation is more meaningful than simply looking at "contains nano or not".

Equipment used by third-party testing agency to test abrasion-resistant self-cleaning retention rate of nano facade coating with scrub tester

IX. Durability Life Logic of Nano Clear Coat

Customers often ask "how many years can the nano clear coat last". There is no single number to this question, because life is determined by the weakest link in several chains. The first link is base material durability: fluorocarbon is longest, silicone-acrylic next, pure acrylic shorter; the second link is the wear rate of the nano functional layer, depending on resin hardness and roughness structure; the third link is environmental intensity, with coastal high salt spray, northern freeze-thaw, and industrial acid rain all accelerating decay. Therefore, evaluating life should separate "base material life" and "nano function retention rate": the base material may last ten years without failure, but the hydrophobic function may wear off in three. A reasonable approach is to design the clear coat as "recoatable"; after function decays, locally or wholly recoat the clear coat to restore it, rather than stripping the primer as well, so the whole life-cycle cost is lowest.

Also account for an environmental ledger: repeated facade renovation means large amounts of old paint entering construction waste, and large consumption of scaffolding and cleaning water. Nano clear coat extends cleaning and renovation cycles, equivalent to reducing these hidden resource consumptions, and has a positive contribution to green buildings and sustainable operation. In green building evaluations (such as LEED, three-star green building), low-maintenance, long-life envelope materials themselves can earn points; nano protection can be included in this narrative, not just as simply "cleaner".

X. Nano Protection Key Points for Different Substrates

Building facade substrates are diverse, and nano protection strategies must be adapted.

Concrete and plastered walls. Highly alkaline and prone to efflorescence; alkali-resistant sealing primer is the prerequisite; nano clear coat focuses on water repellency and mold prevention.

Stone and ceramic tile. Dense but porous surface, pollution easily penetrates; hydrophobic clear coat can significantly reduce water stains and efflorescence, but adhesion must be ensured.

Metal curtain wall (aluminum panel, galvanized steel). First do primer per anti-corrosion, then apply nano weather-resistant clear coat, focusing on corrosion and pitting prevention, see anti-rust system.

Glass and skylight. Both superhydrophobic and photocatalytic apply, aiming to reduce water marks and stains and maintain transparency. Nano clear coat on glass must especially ensure light transmittance does not significantly drop, and does not affect the glass's own sun-shading or energy-saving parameters, so the formulation must be extremely restrained.

The pretreatment and配套 for each substrate are different; one formula cannot fit all. A common problem in actual projects is applying a "universal nano clear coat" rigidly to all substrates, resulting in insufficient adhesion on metal and non-durable water repellency on stone. The correct approach is to design配套 by grouping substrates, and when necessary, conduct small-area trial coating verified for three months before large-scale promotion. This is also the process that responsible suppliers insist on when undertaking facade projects: first diagnose the substrate, then determine the配套, rather than selling the clear coat right away.

11. Comparison of Pollution Types and Nano Countermeasures

Facade pollutants vary widely; selecting a nano solution requires first classifying the type.

Inorganic dust and dirt. The most common; superhydrophobic rolling-off solves it, and it cleans with a rain wash—the scenario nano clear coat excels at.

Oily fume and exhaust soot. Organic stains; hard to remove by hydrophobicity alone, requiring TiO₂ photocatalytic decomposition or periodic low-pressure water rinsing.

Biological stains (mold, algae, lichen). Rely on Ag or ZnO antibacterial and antimold for long-term suppression, combined with hydrophobicity to reduce water retention, cutting off the source.

Water spots and stains. Common on stone and glass; reduced by hydrophobic clear coat minimizing water spreading and evaporation residue.

graffiti. Nano clear coat lowers surface energy, allowing most graffiti to be easily wiped off with solvent—this is "easy-to-clean" rather than "self-cleaning". For facades prone to graffiti such as campuses and subway entrances, the easy-to-clean property is more practical than self-cleaning, significantly reducing cleaning cost and visual pollution.

Matching pollution type to mechanism makes the solution precise, avoiding "applied a layer of nano but didn't solve one's own dirt". A common failure case: the main dirt source of the facade is oily fume, yet only a hydrophobic clear coat was applied, so oil stains cannot be removed and the owner mistakenly thinks nano is ineffective; the correct approach is a hydrophobic plus photocatalytic combination, with periodic low-pressure water rinsing. A pollution diagnosis before selection saves more worry than blindly applying a solution.

12. Maintenance, Recoating, and Life-Cycle Cost

Nano clear coat is not "applied once and forever". Reasonable operation and maintenance amplify its value.

Regular inspection. Visually check clear coat integrity, local detachment, and mold spots annually; early issues can be locally repaired.

Cleaning method. Prioritize natural rain wash; when manual cleaning is needed, use low-pressure water with soft cloth, avoiding hard objects like steel wool scratching the rough structure.

Functional recoating. After hydrophobic or antibacterial function decays, directly recoat a layer of clear coat to restore, without touching primer and intermediate coat—low cost and minimal disruption.

Lifespan ledger. Establish recoating cycles by base material type and environment grade, e.g., strict coastal areas inspected every three years, mild inland every five years. The ledger also accumulates real data to reverse-optimize next-generation formulations, forming a "use—feedback—improve" closed loop.

Designing "recoatable" into the solution makes full-cycle cost far lower than frequent overall renovation, which is the true economic value of nano protection. Many owners only see the slightly higher unit price of nano clear coat, ignoring later cleaning and renovation accounts; once the ten-year total cost of ownership is spread out, nano solutions often save more.

FAQ

FAQ

Q: What are the self-cleaning routes for building facade nano protection?

A: Two main routes: hydrophobic SiO₂'s "superhydrophobic rolling-off" (contact angle >150°, beads carry away dust), and TiO₂ photocatalytic "decomposition plus photo-induced hydrophilic spreading". The two can be combined for more thorough cleaning.

Q: Is the superhydrophobic facade coating wear-resistant?

A: Micro-nano rough structures wear easily; many samples start above 150° but fail after a few wipes. Choose wear-resistant resin embedding, and use post-wipe contact angle retest as acceptance, not just initial value.

Q: Does TiO₂ still have self-cleaning effect on shaded sides or at night?

A: Pure anatase needs UV (wavelength below ~387 nm); weak on shaded sides and at night. Visible-light self-cleaning requires doping (N, Ag, etc.) or pairing with Ag for continuous antibacterial complement. See Nano TiO₂ Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning.

Q: What is nano ZnO used for in architectural coatings?

A: ZnO efficiently blocks UV, slows chalking and discoloration, also antibacterial and antimold, lower cost than Ag, suitable for humid facades. Often combined with hydrophobic SiO₂ for both weather resistance and antimold.

Q: Can nano clear coat replace primer and intermediate coat?

A: No. A complete "primer-intermediate-topcoat"配套 is durable; nano clear coat is only the outermost functional layer, and hollow or efflorescent substrate causes delamination. Metal components also need anti-rust primer, see Nano Composite Anti-Rust Fillers.

Q: What standards are used for acceptance of building nano coatings?

A: Contact angle per ISO 27448, ASTM D7334; self-cleaning per ISO 27448; weathering per GB/T 1865, ISO 11341; adhesion per GB/T 9286; antimold per GB/T 1741; VOC per GB 30981-2020, GB 18582.

Q: Do hydrophobic SiO₂ and photocatalytic TiO₂ contradict each other?

A: Wetting directions are opposite (hydrophobic beading vs hydrophilic filming), but can be zoned, layered, or encapsulated for synergy: stain first decomposed by TiO₂, then carried away by hydrophobic water beads. Key is formulation design avoiding direct cancellation.

Q: Is fluorinated modification safer?

A: Fluorinated surfaces have lowest surface energy and extremely strong hydrophobicity, but face PFAS regulatory risk and cost. Most facades are fine with alkyl-modified SiO₂, no need for blind fluorination.

Q: Any special construction requirements?

A: Substrate must be solid and dry, environment temperature/humidity compliant, clear coat thin and even (extremely thin film suffices), avoid dust contaminating uncured film. Suppliers usually provide process cards for guidance.

Q: What does such building nano protection solution usually include?

A: Kexin New Materials (kexinMaterials) provides "primer-intermediate-topcoat"配套, with topcoat nano clear coat for self-cleaning and weather resistance, factory-completed four-piece retest of contact angle, weathering, antibacterial, wipe; and matching anti-rust system for metal components.

Further Reading