Diagnosis of severely excessive internal stress and film thickness in outdoor anti-corrosion coatings exhibiting "cracking" and "peeling".

2026-06-14 · Category: Technical Knowledge

🌐 This article was automatically translated from Chinese. Please refer to the original Chinese version if needed. · View original (Chinese)

Introduction: Cracking — the Endpoint of a Coating's "Self-Destruction"

Cracking and Peeling are the two failure modes that are the most severe and costliest to repair among all coating defects. Cracking means the integrity of the coating has been completely destroyed, allowing corrosive media to freely penetrate the substrate. And over 90% of early cracking is directly related to out-of-control film thickness management—especially excessive thickness of a single coat.

I. Film Thickness vs. Cracking Risk Relationship (by Coating System)

Coating System Safe Single-Coat DFT Upper Limit (μm) Cracking Risk Range (μm) Internal Stress Source
Epoxy Primer (Solvent-based) ≤150 200-300 (High Risk) Solvent Evaporation Shrinkage + Curing Shrinkage
Epoxy Intermediate Coat (Solvent-based) ≤200 300-400 Same as Above
Polyurethane Topcoat (Aliphatic) ≤80 120-200 Curing Shrinkage + Thermal Stress
Fluorocarbon Topcoat (FEVE) ≤60 100-150 Mainly Solvent Evaporation Shrinkage
Inorganic Zinc-Rich Primer ≤100 150-200 (High Risk) Ethyl Silicate Hydrolysis Condensation Shrinkage

II. Overview of Technical Parameter Comparison

Technical Indicator Standard Requirement Premium Level Test Method
Adhesion ≥3MPa ≥5MPa ISO 4624 Pull-off Method
Salt Spray Resistance ≥500h ≥1000h ASTM B117
Weathering Resistance (QUV) ≥1000h gloss retention >50% ≥3000h gloss retention >80% ISO 16474-3
VOC Content Compliant with GB standard 50% below limit GB/T 23985
Application Window 5-35°C -10~40°C (wide temperature range) TDS Recommended Conditions
Illustration 2
Illustration 3

Technical deepening: systematic optimization methods for process parameters (DOE experimental design)

Coating production process optimization should not rely on the "trial-and-error method" but should adopt the scientific method of DOE experimental design. Taking the dispersion process as an example—factors affecting quality (linear velocity/time/filling rate/temperature), 4 factors each at 3 levels—full factorial requires 81 experiments—DOE uses orthogonal experiment L9 (9 times) or response surface methodology (27 times) to greatly reduce the number of experiments—while obtaining the main effects and interactions of each factor. For example, it is found that "the interaction of linear velocity × time is significant": high linear velocity + short time and low linear velocity + long time can achieve the same dispersion effect—but the former saves energy by >20%.

In DOE analysis, interpretation of the P-value — P95% confidence). The final output of DOE is a set of prediction models (polynomial regression equations) — input line speed/time/temperature → predict fineness/viscosity/gloss — providing formulation engineers with a ”digital formulation optimization” tool.

Industry practice: from "master craftsman's feel" to "parameter standardization"

The common challenge in the coatings industry — when experienced veteran workers retire, their "feel" (mixing resistance / fineness gauge scraping / visual inspection of wet-film gloss) is taken away — new employees cannot replicate it. Transform the "feel" into quantifiable standard parameters (1) mixing resistance → viscometer reading; (2) fineness gauge scraping → fineness gauge reading (μm); (3) wet-film gloss → gloss meter (GU value). The "standard parameter card" for each process is posted next to the equipment — new employees operate according to the "card" rather than "by feel". "Parameter standardization" is a key step for coating factories to move from "workshop" to "factory".

FAQ

Q1: Why does excessive thickness in a single coat cause cracking?Thick coatings (>200μm epoxy) have their surface solvent evaporate first to form a surface-dry film (curing front), while the internal solvent remains liquid—forming a "skin wrapped around water" structure. The subsequent evaporation of the internal solvent causes a volume shrinkage of 3%-8% (typical volumetric shrinkage rate of epoxy systems), while the dried surface film cannot shrink in sync, generating tensile stress—when the tensile stress exceeds the coating's tensile strength, the coating cracks.

Q2: How to measure internal stress?Cantilever beam method: Coat one side of a thin metal sheet (e.g., aluminum foil) with paint → during drying and curing, coating shrinkage causes the metal sheet to bend → measure the radius of curvature → back-calculate the coating internal stress (Stoney formula). A measured value >5 MPa is high risk (may crack). This is a laboratory method, not a field method.

Q3: Difference in shrinkage rate between epoxy primer and epoxy intermediate coat?The primer contains a high volume concentration (PVC) of zinc powder/anticorrosive pigments (40%-60%), with relatively less resin content, resulting in a low curing shrinkage rate (1%-3%). The intermediate coat has a low PVC (15%-25%) and more resin, leading to a higher shrinkage rate (3%-5%). This is why the intermediate coat is more sensitive to film thickness (the risk of cracking rises sharply when a single coat of intermediate coat exceeds 300μm).

Q4: How to distinguish the root causes of cracking and delamination?Cracking: Occurs within the coating (cohesive failure) — attributed to internal stress > coating cohesion. Delamination: Occurs at the coating/substrate or coating/coating interface (interfacial failure) — attributed to adhesion < internal stress. Cracking and delamination often occur together (coating cracks first → water enters at the crack → interfacial corrosion → coating delaminates).

Q5: How to avoid cracking of High Build Epoxy?The formula of high-build epoxy (single-coat film thickness up to 300-500μm) incorporates toughening agents (such as polysulfide rubber/CTBN rubber/polyether amine) to reduce the modulus and internal stress of the coating, and increase the elongation at break to >3% (ordinary epoxy is only 1%-2%). Do NOT use ordinary epoxy as high-build epoxy!

Q6: Effect of drastic temperature changes on cracking?The coefficient of thermal expansion of steel (α=12×10⁻⁶/°C) and epoxy coating (α=40-60×10⁻⁶/°C) differs by 3-5 times. A sudden temperature drop of 30°C (e.g., summer sun exposure → nighttime cooling) can generate thermal stress of 2-5 MPa in the coating, which superimposes with curing shrinkage stress—this is the main reason for coating cracking during service (rather than during application).

Q7: Mechanism of coating cracking caused by UV aging?Surface resin UV degradation → decrease in cohesive strength of surface resin → microcracks form on the surface → cracks propagate under temperature variation/external force → eventual through-cracking. The cracking induced by UV aging differs from that caused by film thickness in that: UV cracking develops from the surface inward (surface chalking first → then cracking), while film-thickness cracking develops from inside the coating outward (internal stress accumulation → tearing from within).

Q8: How to determine the repair scope for cracked coating?The actual damage scope of a cracked coating is much larger than the visually visible cracks — coating within 50–100 mm around the cracks may have developed microcracks (detectable by dye penetrant method — apply penetrant containing fluorescent dye to the cracked area → observe microcrack fluorescence under UV light). The repair scope needs to be extended to 100 mm beyond the cracks or to the intact coating boundary determined by penetrant testing.

Q9: Comparison of cracking tendency between water-based paint and solvent-based paint?The curing shrinkage rate of water-based paint is usually < that of solvent-based paint (water-based resin has a higher molecular weight and lower solvent (water) content) — the maximum single-coat film thickness of water-based paint can be 10%–20% higher than that of solvent-based paint. However, the brittleness of the fully cured water-based coating (high Tg) may be higher — its tendency for thermal-cracking during long-term service is not necessarily lower.

Q10: Is coating cracking the "final stop" of all defects?Ranked by severity of failure: loss of gloss/chalking < orange peel < pinholes < blistering < peeling < cracking (most severe). Cracking is an irreversible structural failure of the entire coating—once it occurs, the coating must be completely removed and reapplied (costing 3–5 times that of new construction coating). This is why film thickness control is the number one parameter in coating quality control—to ensure cracking does not occur.

Illustration 4

FAQ: In-Depth Technical Q&A Supplement

Q11: How do the differences in domestic and international standards for this technology affect product export?Domestic standards (GB) differ from ISO/ASTM standards in test methods and acceptance criteria. For example, salt spray testing—GB/T 1771 (equivalent to ISO 7253) has test conditions basically consistent with ASTM B117—but the rating systems (ISO 4628 vs ASTM D610/D714) differ—when providing test reports for exported products, the corresponding international standards must be indicated simultaneously, otherwise overseas customers cannot make a comparative assessment. It is recommended to list both GB and ISO/ASTM dual-standard indicators in the TDS (Technical Data Sheet) of exported products—to enhance the trust of international customers.

Q12: How to verify the long-term service performance of this technology in actual engineering?Laboratory accelerated testing (salt spray/QUV/cyclic corrosion) provides comparative data—but cannot fully replace actual outdoor exposure testing. Recommendations—(1) Set up outdoor exposure racks at both the factory location and typical customer locations (e.g., coastal C5-M/industrial C4)—conduct annual inspections of coating appearance/adhesion/film thickness changes—establish a company-owned outdoor service database; (2) Collaborate with universities/research institutes—combine enterprise data with academic research—enhance data credibility.

Q13: What should SMEs pay attention to when purchasing related raw materials/equipment?(1) The batch stability of suppliers is more important than unit price—it is recommended to require suppliers to provide COA data for >10 batches—and evaluate batch variation (CpK); (2) For equipment procurement, visit peers who have used the equipment for >2 years to understand the long-term reliability and after-sales service quality of the equipment—rather than relying only on the demonstration data from equipment suppliers; (3) For key raw materials (resin/curing agent)—maintain at least 2 qualified suppliers to guard against single-supply risk.

Q14: What is the current state and trend of digital transformation in this field?The digital transformation of the coatings industry is evolving from “point-based applications” (automation of individual equipment/processes) to ”system integration” (full-chain ERP+MES+PMS). Currently, for small and medium-sized coatings factories, the digitalization with the ”highest ROI investment” is automatic batching systems + digitalization of quality control data—with a payback period of 1-3 years—which is the prioritized recommended direction. Future trend—AI + sensors enabling real-time optimization of process parameters—further reducing quality fluctuations between batches.

Q15: How can a newly entered coating engineer quickly master this technology?(1)Combine theory and practiceDo not only read literature without touching actual production—nor rely solely on experience without studying theory;(2)Establish a “failure case archive”Every customer complaint/production anomaly/coating failure—record the root cause and resolution process—this is the most effective learning material;(3)Learn from suppliersTechnical personnel from resin/additive/pigment suppliers are carriers of "tacit knowledge" in this field—communicate more with them about solutions to specific problems.

Related Reading

Summary

Coating cracking and delamination are the most severe forms of coating failure—loss of film thickness control (single coat >200 μm epoxy / >80 μm topcoat) is the number one cause of cracking. The mechanical essence of cracking lies in the imbalance between internal coating stress (curing shrinkage + thermal stress + UV degradation) and coating cohesive strength. Strictly enforcing the single-coat film thickness upper limit for each coat is the most effective engineering measure to prevent cracking—because film thickness is the most easily measured in real time among coating quality control parameters (wet film gauge / dry film gauge), and also the most easily overlooked.

Tags: #内应力 #ApplicationDefects #Coating剥落 #Coating开裂 #Coatings technology literature #Film Thickness控制